Article Friendly article publishing script homepage.
Translate Page To German Tranlate Page To Spanish Translate Page To French Translate Page To Italian Translate Page To Japanese Translate Page To Korean Translate Page To Portuguese Translate Page To Chinese
  Number Times Read : 63      
Categories

Accessories
All
Arts
Business
Cars and Trucks
CGI
Coding Sites
Computers
Cooking
Crafts
Current Affairs
Databases
Entertainment
Film
Finances
Gardening
Healthy Living
Holidays
Home
Internet
Medical
Men Only
Motorcyles
Our Pets
Outdoors
Relationships
Religion
Self Improvement
Sports
Staying Fit
Technology
Travel
Web Design
Weddings
Women Only
Writing
 
Stats
Total Articles: 435316
Total Authors: 73018
Total Downloads: 3529641


Newest Member
Hicola Iswald

 


   

Sticks and Stones Will Break My Bones, But Twitter May Ruin Me!



[Valid RSS feed]  Category Rss Feed - http://www.alltimeinfo.com/rss.php?rss=24
By : Eli Kantor    29 or more times read
Submitted 2010-06-30 12:53:15
There is a growing danger in the American workplace for employers and employees alike: Facebook and its brethren. Social media technology is constantly evolving, far more rapidly than privacy jurisprudence - which, comparatively, stumbles along like a decrepit wagon. That is why every employer must have a sound social networking policy, which strikes a balance between protecting employees' privacy rights and maintaining company integrity.

Many employers consider social media a remote cultural trend that has little significance for business. Likewise, the general public tends to think that if it's on the computer, then it is private. Nothing could be further from the truth. Indeed, modern social media gives new meaning to the phrase "life and death is in the power of the tongue."

Consider the Domino's Pizza debacle last April. Two employees posted a video on YouTube that showed them violating health codes while preparing food, such as passing gas on sandwiches, and stuffing cheese into their noses. Worse than the video, which garnered millions of viewers, were the comments that traumatized customers posted on Twitter. Because Domino's had no Twitter account to combat the blitz, it was defenseless. Needless to say Domino's opened a Twitter account the next day to address customer concerns.

For this reason, we were given the teeth and the lips as our two guards from slights of the tongue. These protectors must be strong, yet adaptable. Employers need to implement shielding policies, but also promote their business. Bear in mind the purpose of social media is an outreach tool. It enables every employee to be a spokesperson for the company - whether the company likes it or not. Hence, while employers must curb carelessness, it is important not to stifle creativity.

A sound policy should make clear to employees that only "public" information, like press releases and marketing materials, may be shared on social media sites - that is, if the company wishes to offer any leeway at all to its employees. And firmly insist that only "public" information may be used on social media sites. Moreover, since social media is constantly evolving, the policy must be broad enough to anticipate future, more dynamic media platforms.

For example, Apple will soon release the iPhone 4 - enabling video-phone calls - which, in Apple's words, "Changes everything. Again." If you thought Twitter's instant text feed was too tempting for American impulsivity, wait until you can upload live video from your mobile device. A robust company policy will restrict the content of what employees can broadcast, rather than the platforms they can use. The result limits what employees can say, but not how they can say it - as not to hamper ingenuity.

Employees may contend that they have a right of privacy, at least as to their own social media. This is not the case since the recent California Court of Appeal decision in Moreno v. Hanford Sentinel, Inc. The Court stated that by posting on Myspace, the material on plaintiff Moreno's profile was provided "to the public at large. Her potential audience was vast."

The Court reasoned that Myspace is "a hugely popular internet site," and that "no reasonable person would have had an expectation of privacy" regarding postings on the site. Despite whatever settings an employee may have in place, social-networking sites are not private because profiles are available for so many to see. That is why the company policy will extend to both personal and company social networking sites.

Still, employers must go a step further. By setting clear parameters of what is permitted on social media as to the workplace, you put the employee on notice. But employees must do more than simply read the policy. Employees should be required to sign off on the fact that they have read and understood the policy. That way, should a lawsuit arise, regarding wrongful termination for example, an employer can point to a signature that attests to the employee's knowledge of company policy. To that end, the human resources department should also thoroughly explain the policy, and field any queries an employee might have.
Author Resource:- Eli Kantor is an attorney in private practice in Beverly Hills, California, representing employers and employees in all aspects of labor, employment and immigration law. For more information contact Eli at (310) 274-8216 or visit his websites: www.beverlyhillsemploymentlaw.com and www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com.
Article From All Time Info Articles

Related Articles

HTML Ready Article. Click on the "Copy" button to copy into your clipboard.




Firefox users please select/copy/paste as usual
Rate This Article
Vote to see the results!

Do you like this article?
  • Yes.
  • Not Sure.
  • No.
New Members
select
Sign up
select
learn more
Affiliate Sign in
Affiliate Sign In
 
Nav Menu
Home
Login
Submit Articles
Submission Guidelines
Top Articles
Link Directory
About Us
Contact Us
Privacy Policy
RSS Feeds

Actions
Print This Article
Add To Favorites

 
Sponsors

Purchase this software

 

Powered By: Article Directory AlltimeInfo SiteMap